<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a such thing as a concept car?</title>
	<link>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679</link>
	<description>news, reviews, and buzz on the chrysler group's products</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DodgeTomahawk</title>
		<link>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7268</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 05:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7268</guid>
					<description>When i see Rampage,i see something that will not be produced,the front wheel drive and unfinished suspension come to mind and not being able to mix with anything produced on a line.....The only thing i take from Rampage is body sheetmetal design,especially the front clip.

Your concepts today have to revolve around what you produce at the factories in one way or another,for the use of the under lying platform.Its about making money,selling a product,yet captureing an audience with that product and units sold....the 300c comes to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i see Rampage,i see something that will not be produced,the front wheel drive and unfinished suspension come to mind and not being able to mix with anything produced on a line&#8230;..The only thing i take from Rampage is body sheetmetal design,especially the front clip.</p>
<p>Your concepts today have to revolve around what you produce at the factories in one way or another,for the use of the under lying platform.Its about making money,selling a product,yet captureing an audience with that product and units sold&#8230;.the 300c comes to mind.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7267</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 21:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7267</guid>
					<description>when i see the rampage, i see the 2010 dakota...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i see the rampage, i see the 2010 dakota&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hemidakota</title>
		<link>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7265</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7265</guid>
					<description>Flexability is the key for profit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flexability is the key for profit&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7257</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7257</guid>
					<description>Re: Brian Miller's statement that he'd "rather have good concepts that make it into productin that incredible machiens that  are released to tease theMopar fans and then collect dust."  

   SECOND THE MOTION!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Brian Miller&#8217;s statement that he&#8217;d &#8220;rather have good concepts that make it into productin that incredible machiens that  are released to tease theMopar fans and then collect dust.&#8221;  </p>
<p>   SECOND THE MOTION!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7254</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 12:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chryslerweblog.com/?p=679#comment-7254</guid>
					<description>True, there really havent been very many "out there" concepts from Chrysler.  But remember the Super 8 Hemi (the car the magnum, 300 and charger all came from)?  That thing was ugly, real ugly.  And some concepts have not been green lighted yet.  The fire power might not make it through the bean counters.  From what I remember Chrysler made amazing concepts when their actual cars were lackluster.  The Chronos,  Phaeton, original Charger concept, etc where all released when the best we had to hope for was a 250 HP Dodge Intrepid/300M and what would become of the SRT shop was still only making Vipers and Prowlers.  In the 90's a Chrysler exec saying "HEMI" would be like Cadillac exec saying "Rear wheel drive," but look how things have changed.  I'd rather have good concepts that make it into production than incredible machines that are released to tease the Mopar fans and then collect dust.  Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, there really havent been very many &#8220;out there&#8221; concepts from Chrysler.  But remember the Super 8 Hemi (the car the magnum, 300 and charger all came from)?  That thing was ugly, real ugly.  And some concepts have not been green lighted yet.  The fire power might not make it through the bean counters.  From what I remember Chrysler made amazing concepts when their actual cars were lackluster.  The Chronos,  Phaeton, original Charger concept, etc where all released when the best we had to hope for was a 250 HP Dodge Intrepid/300M and what would become of the SRT shop was still only making Vipers and Prowlers.  In the 90&#8217;s a Chrysler exec saying &#8220;HEMI&#8221; would be like Cadillac exec saying &#8220;Rear wheel drive,&#8221; but look how things have changed.  I&#8217;d rather have good concepts that make it into production than incredible machines that are released to tease the Mopar fans and then collect dust.  Just my 2 cents.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
